Thanks a lot Jeni!

Three weeks have passed and no one has posted any objections.

Therefore, would it be possible that the definition of exslt:node-set()
be changed on the exslt website?

For me this would be one of the important results of EXSL (provided, of
course, that the implementors correct the behaviour of their
implementation of exslt:node-set() to match the definition).

Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.

--- Jeni Tennison <jeni@[...].com>  wrote:
>  Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>  > In order to correct this situation, I propose the definition of
>  > exslt:node-set() to be changed:
>  >
>  > "The exsl:node-set function takes an argument, which is a result
>  > tree fragment and returns a node set, which has exactly the same
>  > structure, names and values nodes. The exslt:node-set() function
>  > does not have side effects, e.g. it does not change the its
>  > argument".
>  
>  I agree. Anyone else have an objection?
>  
>  Cheers,
>  
>  Jeni
>  
>  ---
>  Jeni Tennison
>  http://www.jenitennison.com/
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  exslt mailing list
>  list@[...].org
>  http://www.exslt.org/list


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
list@[...].org
http://www.exslt.org/list