& XSLT On Friday 14 July 2006 11:12, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>  >>>>> "Florent" == Florent Georges <darkman_spam@[...].fr> writes:
> 
>      Colin> This is no good. That means two functions calls that pass the
>      Colin> value 3 will not (usually) be memoized.
> 
>      Florent>   Maybe it would make sense to say:
> 
>      Florent>     - if the argument is an atomic item (or a sequence of
>      Florent> 1 such item, as these are indistinguishable), compare by
>      Florent> value (string() or data()?);
> 
>  Good.
> 
>      Florent>     - if the argument is a node, compare with the "is"
>      Florent> operator;
> 
>  Good.
> 
>      Florent>     - else (so if it is a sequence of at least 2 items),
>      Florent> compare by identity (the two sequences must be the same
>      Florent> one).  I think such a "sequence identity" doesn't exist
>      Florent> in the CRs.
> 
>  Re-formulate that as compare each item of the sequence of identity as
>  determined above.

Perhaps it's better to simply map it into a call to fn:deep-equal()? Seems to 
simply spec'ing it.

(Not that I'm in favor or against the idea as a whole.)


Cheers,

		Frans
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
list@[...].org
http://www.exslt.org/list