& XSLT Frans Englich wrote:

>  Perhaps it's better to simply map it into a call to
>  fn:deep-equal()?  Seems to simply spec'ing it.

  IMHO, it is the wrong way, for two reasons:

    - identity preserve more properties (at least the
      identity itself), so the developer doesn't have to
      bother because some property is not preserved (with
      the counterpart that, in some cases, more memoized
      values will be recorded, when identity is not
      relevant);

    - identity is tested fast (in the worst case scenario,
      it is O(n) where n is the number of memoized values,
      when no special search is performed, while deep-equal
      is O(n*s), where s is the size of the values).

  But as Colin pointed, it is not possible to test identity
on atomic items.  But for them, IMHO, equality is the right
choice.

  Regards,

--drkm






















	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolut
ionnaire.
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
list@[...].org
http://www.exslt.org/list