Subversion 1.4 has 'Support for BerkeleyDB 4.4 and its "auto recovery" 
feature' making it much less prone to wedging. The advantage of fsfs is 
that you can place the repository on a shared file system. DBD requires 
a POSIX compliant file system.

See 
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.reposadmin.planning.html#svn.reposadmin.basics.backen
ds 
for a full comparison.

Michael

Trent Mick wrote:
>  Trent Mick wrote:
> >>>  * We're using FSFS rather than the Berkley DB backend.
> > Jeff Griffiths wrote:
> >> @David: what is the advantage there?
> > I believe it is less prone to getting wedged. Occassionally -- with 
> > other Subversion releases anyway -- a Berkeley DB backend could get 
>  
>  I meant:
>  ...with *older* Subversion releases...
>  
>  
>  Trent
>  
_______________________________________________
Komodo-discuss mailing list
Komodo-discuss@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
Other options: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/Komodo-discuss