Travis Oliphant wrote:

>   They just don't 
>  *stay* 0-d arrays and are converted to array scalars at almost every 
>  opportunity....

I'm still confused as to what the difference is. This (recent) 
convesation started with my desire for a mutable scalar. CAn array 
scalars fill this role?

What I mean by that role is some way to do:

x += 5 # (and friends)
x[()] = 45 # or some other notation


And have x be the same object throughout.

Heck even something like:

x.set(45)

would work for me.

Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> >>>x[...] = 10
>  
>  or
>  
> >>>x[()] = 10

I can't do that. HAs that been added since version: '0.9.2' ?

-Chris



-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
                                     		
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT         (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker@[...].gov


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion