On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Sasha apparently wrote: 
>  If you agree that zero-stride array would provide the 
>  functionality that you need, it may tip the ballance 
>  towards accepting that patch. 

I am out of my technical depth here.  Based on your 
examples, zero-stride arrays seem both logical and 
desirable.  They do seem just right for a simpler (and 
substantially generalized) nd_grid.  But I think they only 
partially address problems two other that have come up.

1. repmat
   http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/repmat.html#998661

Perhaps you will say that the best representation of 
a repmat will use 4 dimensions, two with zero strides?
I wonder if a more general cycling is needed for a natural 
repeated matrix.

2. Kronecker product:
   http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/kron.html#998881
   This seems a different issue altogether.  I suspect the 
   right way to produce kron(x,y) is usually as a class 
   whose data is x and y, with the Kronecker product never 
   actually stored in memory.  I do not see zero-stride 
   arrays as helping here.

Cheers,
Alan Isaac




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion