[Fwd: [Fwd: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy and PEP 343]]
by Tim Hochberg other posts by this author
Mar 4 2006 7:00AM messages near this date
Re: [Numpy-discussion] numexpr
|
[Fwd: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy and PEP 343]
Check this out:
Expression: where(0.1*a > arctan2(a, b), 2*a, arctan2(a,b))
numpy: 0.706635284652
Skipping weave timing
numexpr: 0.19127785794
Speed-up of numexpr over numpy: 3.69428689898
270% speed up! Pretty cool. Unfortunately, my implementation of two and
three argument functions is still buggy if one of the arguments is a
constant. I'm not sure what the best tactic is to deal with that. My
strategy for dealing with opcodes that require more than three arguments
(just 'where' at present) was to just use two opcode blocks. The second
opcode block had the opcode OP_NOOP (which does nothing), but the first
opcode steals arguments from it. It's pretty simple and more or less
infinitely expandable.
I'm off to bed now, perhaps the answer to the constant dilemma will be
clear in the morning.
[next morning]
OK, I know how to fix it, I just need to scrape together a few minutes to do it.
-tim
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
|