Tim Hochberg <tim.hochberg@[...].net>  writes:

>  I just commited a bunch of changes to numexpr in the sandbox (BTW,
>  thanks to Robert Kern for pointing me to the right location for that).
> 
>  At this point, there's a fairly complete framework for evaluationg
>  numeric expressions (as long as they're not complex, and have unit
>  stride and are all the same size etc, OK maybe not so complete, but
>  potentially very useful nonetheless). A couple basic operations (**
>  and %) need to be filled in as well as a bunch of functions. Still
>  most basic operaions work. A bunch of 2- and 3-arg functions work as
>  well
>  as 'where'.
> 
>  I'll wait to hear from David Cooke to see how he likes the current
>  function framework -- if he likes it, I'll go ahead and fill in the
>  other common functions. It would also  be nice to support sum and
>  product as David mentioned, but I haven't though about that at all
>  yet.

Looks good.

-- 
|> |\/|<
/--------------------------------------------------------------------------|David M. Cooke  
                    http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/
|cookedm@[...].ca


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion