Yes, I know now.  I just went through my local CVS archive and something
went wrong somewhere in the past resulting in this falling through the
cracks.  I corrected the differences and all is well now. :-)

Thanks,
Ardo

D. Hageman (dhageman@dracken.com) wrote:
>  
>  Well ... it actually already supports the exslt functions without the 
>  patch ... just an FYI.
>  
>  
>  On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>  
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > I got a bug report against the Debian package of XML::LibXSLT for
>  > supporting the libexslt extension funxtions through the patch below.
>  > Could this be added to the next version as I'm sure more people are
>  > interested in this?
>  > 
>  > I also noticed that the Makefile.PL checks for XML::LibXML v1.49+ in
>  > one place while the PREREQ only requires v0.94+
>  > 
>  > Thanks,
>  > Ardo
>  > 
>  > ======================================================================
>  > --- Makefile.PL~        Sun Sep  8 10:32:56 2002
>  > +++ Makefile.PL Sun Sep  8 10:33:54 2002
>  > @@ -65,6 +65,11 @@
>  >  DEATH
>  >  }
>  > 
>  > +if (have_library("exslt")) {
>  > +    $config{LIBS} .= " -lexslt";
>  > +    $config{INC} .= " -DHAVE_EXSLT"
>  > +}
>  > +
>  >  WriteMakefile(
>  >      'NAME'     => 'XML::LibXSLT',
>  >      'VERSION_FROM' => 'LibXSLT.pm', # finds $VERSION
>  > ======================================================================
>  > 
>  
>  -- 
>  //========================================================\> ||  D. Hageman               
     <dhageman@[...].com>   ||
>  \\========================================================//
>  

-- 
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@[...].org
home page:  http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp:   3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73  7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
_______________________________________________
Perl-XML mailing list
Perl-XML@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs