ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> perl-xml
perl-xml
Re: Namespace support in SAX serialisers
by Robin Berjon other posts by this author
Oct 17 2005 3:04AM messages near this date
view in the new Beta List Site
Re: Namespace support in SAX serialisers | Re: Namespace support in SAX serialisers
& XSLT Dominic Mitchell wrote:
>  What do you think it should do?  I reckon:
>  
>  * Look at LocalName first and then fall back to Name if it's not present 
>  (ignoring the prefix on Name).
>  
>  * Look at Prefix first and if not present, divine it from Name.

Yes, and it should auto-generate prefixes when none are provided (even 
if it makes things look ugly).

Ideally, this sort of functionality which turns a non-conformant stream 
into a conformant one should be abstracted into a separate module (a 
filter) so that other pieces of the SAX infrastructure could reuse it. 
XML::SAX::Writer would then return that filter instead of itself from 
new() (that's already what it does with another filter). This prevents 
everyone from reinventing this wheel, no matter how simple it may seem 
to be.

>  I've just been looking at this part of Genx recently in an attempt to 
>  understand quite how it works (I'm attempting a Java rewrite in order to 
>  bone up on my java skills).  I'll have to say that I'm still figuring 
>  out what's going on in there.  It's certainly given me new respect for 
>  the complexity of namespaces.  :-)

Rule 0 is if you think namespaces are complex, you're very, very 
probably reading too much into them.

That being said, *writing* XML correctly is a more complex task than 
people often realize. It's not at all intractable, but there's a bunch 
of small catches that will get you at some point. Most XML writers have 
some parts that are hard to understand at first but make sense if you 
walk them through writing out something with a debugger. When they don't 
have slightly strange bits, they'll write incorrect XML ;)

>  Yes; you certainly should be able to omit the Prefix if required.  As 
>  far as I can see you should be able to use LocalName and NamespaceURI 
>  and nothing else.  Prefix's should be honoured if supplied, but they 
>  shouldn't be mandatory.

Ideally you should only need either of:

  - namespace and local name (prefix gets auto-generated)
  - prefix and local name (assuming the prefix mapping events are right)
  - name (with the same assumption)

and of course anything that gives you more information than any of the 
above.

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/


_______________________________________________
Perl-XML mailing list
Perl-XML@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
Thread:
A. Pagaltzis
Petr Cimprich
A. Pagaltzis
Petr Cimprich
A. Pagaltzis
Robin Berjon
Petr Cimprich
Dominic Mitchell
A. Pagaltzis
Robin Berjon
Dominic Mitchell
Robin Berjon
A. Pagaltzis
Robin Berjon
A. Pagaltzis
Robin Berjon
A. Pagaltzis
A. Pagaltzis
Dominic Mitchell
Robin Berjon
Dominic Mitchell
A. Pagaltzis
Dominic Mitchell
Dominic Mitchell

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved