>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Michel Rodriguez [mailto:mrodrigu@[...].com]
>  
>  On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jenda Krynicky wrote:
>  
>  > The import of the 20MB file that took 5.5 hours on my computer on
>  > Friday now takes about 6 minutes ;-)
>  > I could probably make it 3 minutes, but that's not worth 
>  the effort ;-)
>  
>  I am glad I remembered about XML::RAX. It did not get much press but I
>  liked the idea, as obviously a lot of people use XML for 
>  table-like data.
>  
>  Despite the obvious usefulness of standards like SAX and DOM 
>  (should we
>  start working on the pull standard James Clark called for 
>  BTW?) I like the
>  fact that there are many different paradigms that can be used 
>  to process
>  XML. RAX, PYX, Grove, DT... can all be useful

One thing that's cool about SAX is it's not just a framework for building
solutions on, it's a framework for building frameworks on. Like Barrie's
recent XML::SAX::ByRecord.

I think this year is going to be a very cool year for Perl and SAX stuff.

Matt.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by Mes
sageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, a
round the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk
_______________________________________________
Perl-XML mailing list
Perl-XML@[...].com
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-xml