>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Duncan Cameron [mailto:dcameron@[...].uk]
>  
>  2) aren't we in danger of namespace overload/confusion with all the
>  recent packages, i.e. XML::SAX::Machines, XML::Handler::xxx and
>  XML::Filter::xxx.
>  Maybe everthing to do with machines should be within the 
>  XML::SAXMachines
>  namespace, and XML::Filter and XML::Handler should contain only
>  general purpose handlers or filters.
>  I've not read the docs with all your new packages so I might be just
>  confusing myself.

SAX::Machines is just a constructor for SAX systems. So I think it would be
better to have a top level SAX namespace on CPAN, rather than anything else.
However new TLN's are really hard to push through modules@[...].org (though
maybe it's time to try again, especially now that we have non-XML SAX
drivers)

Matt.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by Mes
sageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, a
round the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk
_______________________________________________
Perl-XML mailing list
Perl-XML@[...].com
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-xml