ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> perl5-porters
perl5-porters
Re: hooks in @INC of the form &code:function::name
by Nicholas Clark other posts by this author
Nov 26 2003 11:19PM messages near this date
hooks in @INC of the form &code:function::name | Re: hooks in @INC of the form &code:function::name
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:15:21PM -0800, Edward S. Peschko wrote:
>  I'd like to make perl be able to handle syntax like:
>  
>  @INC = ( '&code:function::name', 'lib', 'lib2' );
>  
>  which would work the same as 
>  
>  @INC = ( sub { }, 'lib', 'lib2' );
>  
>  except be more robust in being able to be evaluated (again, this is hurting in 
>  PAR, which uses code refs in @INC and hence doesn't handle AutoLoader.pm and 
>  Inline.pm very well - both of which use eval "use something" or require "something",
>  which stringifies @INC and hence breaks any code refs in it). 

Do you have an example of AutoLoader breaking with a code ref @INC?
IIRC ex::lib::zip tests loading autosplit modules via a code ref @INC and
everything works.

I'd like to find the "like" syntax, as I don't feel calm with the idea
of strings in @INC starting '&' now having special meaning.
[Although only BOFHs on Unix would go around using local directories with
names starting & for holding their modules]

Nicholas Clark
Thread:
Edward S. Peschko
Nicholas Clark
Rafael Garcia-Suarez

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved