Re: Why extra -I in "make test"?
by Nick Ing-Simmons other posts by this author
Jul 1 2001 4:12AM messages near this date
Re: Why extra -I in "make test"?
|
[ID 20010630.004] Segfault on gethostbyaddr call which returns
multiple PTR records
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@[...].fi> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:58:04AM -0700, Gurusamy Sarathy wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:30:27 CDT, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > >On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 11:28:28AM -0400, schwern@[...].com wrote:
> > >> This really shouldn't be leaking out of the core. I'm trying to
> > >> rewire it so MakeMaker only adds the extra -I's when building the core
> > >> and leaves them out otherwise. Anyone think of a good way to detect
> > >> when we're building a core module? Would it be too much to require an
> > >> IS_CORE flag in the Makefile.PL's?
> > >
> > >Sounds like a plan. Use PERL_CORE just to agree with the cc -D flag.
> >
> > Nope, should be using INSTALLDIRS=perl as the hint instead.
>
> Hmmm, yes, might work.
But I do that all the time for non-core extensions.
I only install in (shared) site when proven to work with this perl.
>
> > Sarathy
> > gsar@[...].com
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
Thread:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Gurusamy Sarathy
Michael G Schwern
Gurusamy Sarathy
Michael G Schwern
Gurusamy Sarathy
Gurusamy Sarathy
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Nick Ing-Simmons
|