Re: CPAN and module VERSION numbers generated from CVS/RCS
by David M. Lloyd other posts by this author
Aug 2 2001 3:03PM messages near this date
Re: CPAN and module VERSION numbers generated from CVS/RCS
|
Re: CPAN and module VERSION numbers generated from CVS/RCS
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> vstrings are not the same as VERSION and not many people seem to be
> using them in their modules. I'm not sure if it's attractive to add
> more options to an already, seemingly, difficult task of just getting
> a version into the module itself, but it might be interesting to see
> if it works. VERSION in my estimation should be simple and
> straightforward. Incrementing from "0.01" seems to suit most who can
> be bothered to include it so vstring version numbers may be more
> complexity than is really necessary.
I think that complexity isn't the reason that vstrings aren't used as
version numbers. I tried to use vstrings in my module but xsubpp seems to
choke on them, and I didn't have time to debug the problem, so I just
switched back to q{1.00} style.
I think that vstrings are as simple as you can get, I mean what's
difficult about v1.0?
- D
<dmlloyd@[...].net>
Thread:
David Dyck
Johan Vromans
Jim Cromie
John Peacock
Graham Barr
Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Michael G Schwern
Ronald J Kimball
Michael G Schwern
John Peacock
David M. Lloyd
Ronald J Kimball
Elaine -HFB- Ashton
|