At 5:20 PM +0200 8/2/02, Jerome Vouillon wrote:
>   > Waving my hands somewhat more quickly, as an optimization, lexicals can
> >  just live in registers when the compiler sees no references to %MY or
> >  closures.  Nastiness like eval and caller.MY can be handled by inserting
> >  fixup code to reconstruct the lexical array on demand.
> 
> caller.MY is especially nasty because you have to pay for it even when
> you don't use it: you can't know whether a function has to support it
> just by looking at the function code.  It will be really tricky to
> implement any optimization if one can write things like:
>    caller(1).MY{'$y'} := $x

Please note that, regardless of what this sort of thing gets in the 
way of, it'll *still* be as fast or faster than perl 5. Which is the 
ultimate goal, the rest being a bit of a bonus.
-- 
                                         Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@[...].org                         have teddy bears and even
                                       teddy bears get drunk