Whups, sorry, I meant to say "OS X 10.3", with its gcc (3.3).  I agree that
it seems to build fine on Tiger.

On 8/30/06, Will Coleda <will@[...].com>  wrote:
> 
>  What version of OSX and gcc are you using? I haven't seen this
>  problem on 10.4.7 PPC with gcc 4.0.1.
> 
>  Did it just break recently??
> 
>  Not that I see any problem applying this patch, regardless.
> 
>  On Aug 30, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> 
>  > Currently compilation fails on OS X with gcc/g++, because "-bundle"
>  > as the
>  > first argument gets interpreted as a request to run the "undle"
>  > version of
>  > the compiler.  It works fine as a later argument, so there's no
>  > need to
>  > break compatibility with the Apple compiler:
>  >
>  > Index: config/init/hints/darwin.pm
>  > ===================================================================
>  > --- config/init/hints/darwin.pm (revision 14355)
>  > +++ config/init/hints/darwin.pm (working copy)
>  > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>  >         link                => 'c++',
>  >         ld                  => 'c++',
>  >         ld_share_flags      => '-dynamiclib -undefined suppress',
>  > -        ld_load_flags       => '-bundle -undefined suppress',
>  > +        ld_load_flags       => '-undefined suppress -bundle',
>  >         memalign            => 'some_memalign',
>  >         has_dynamic_linking     => 1,
>  >         # XXX when built against a dynamic libparrot
>  > installable_parrot
>  > records
>  >
>  > --
>  > Mark J. Reed <markjreed@[...].com>
> 
>  --
>  Will "Coke" Coleda
>  will@[...].com
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@[...].com>