Re: return() in pointy blocks
by Larry Wall other posts by this author
Jun 8 2005 10:43AM messages near this date
Re: return() in pointy blocks
|
Re: return() in pointy blocks
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:37:22PM +0200, "TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)" wrote:
: BTW, is -> on the 'symbolic unary' precedence level
: as its read-only companion \ ?.
No, -> introduces a term that happens to consist of a formal signature
and a block. There are no ordinary expressions involved until you
get inside the block. (Or set a default on one of the parameters, to
the extent that those are ordinary expressions.)
Larry
Thread:
Ingo Blechschmidt
Matt Fowles
Luke Palmer
=22TSa_=28Thomas_Sandla=DF=29=22
=22TSa_=28Thomas_Sandla=DF=29=22
Larry Wall
"TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)"
Larry Wall
Matt Fowles
|
