Hi,

I think, that David's version is matches with my opinion. I don't think, 
that "beginners" would be a better name for it, but maybe more 
practical, as it's a more evident name.

Bye,
   Andras

David Storrs wrote:
>  On Jun 15, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>  
> > And here they are...  this is just a draft -- feel free to flame/edit/
> > tear it apart liberally.  These are also written assuming we don't
> > create a perl6-general list (but it shouldn't be hard to adapt them
> > should one be created).
>  
>  
>  Well, I'd suggest the following.  (Anything not mentioned stays as  you 
>  wrote it.)
>  
> > perl6-language
> >     This is the "theory of" list. Discussion of the design of the  perl6
> >     language, and its desired (or unwanted) feature list. If you have
> >     patches and/or suggestions for improving the Perl 6 design  documents
> >     (Apocalypses, Synopses, etc.), send them here.
>  
>  
>  perl6-howto
>      This is the "practice of" list.  Come here to ask "How do I...",  "What
>      does XYZ mean?", or "Why doesn't this work?"  Novices are  especially
>      welcome.
>  
>  (Note:  I envision this list being much like beginners@[...].org, but  I 
>  never liked that name because it seems like it would drive away  those 
>  who have a question but do not consider themselves beginners.   On the 
>  other hand, maybe it's more important to explicitly welcome  novices.  I 
>  could go either way:  maybe the above list should be  'perl6-beginners')
>