Re: Ignoring parameters
by Patrick R. Michaud other posts by this author
Jun 17 2005 3:40PM messages near this date
Re: Ignoring parameters
|
Re: Ignoring parameters
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 08:18:17AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> The point being that methods no longer topicalize their invocant.
To update the design docs, A06 currently says:
Methods, submethods, macros, rules, and pointy subs all
bind their first argument to C<$_> ; ordinary subs declare a lexical
C<$_> but leave it undefined.
So, methods and submethods no longer bind their
first argument to C<$_> ? Then do we need this statement at all?
(I'm suspecting that rules won't need it, leaving just macros and
pointy subs.)
There are other places in A06 that discuss methods, submethods, and
multimethods binding their first arguments to $_ -- I'll see about
putting [Update:...] notes in there for each of those.
I'll also come up with some patches to S12 for the ./ syntax.
Pm
Thread:
Gaal Yahas
Luke Palmer
John Siracusa
Damian Conway
John Siracusa
David Storrs
Matthew Zimmerman
Juerd
Matthew Zimmerman
Damian Conway
David Storrs
Juerd
Kurt
Jonathan Scott Duff
Juerd
Juerd
Kurt
Juerd
John Siracusa
John Siracusa
Adam Kennedy
Juerd
John Siracusa
Adam Kennedy
John Siracusa
Darren Duncan
John Siracusa
Juerd
Juerd
Darren Duncan
John Siracusa
John Siracusa
John Siracusa
Damian Conway
Abhijit Mahabal
Damian Conway
Patrick R. Michaud
John Siracusa
Larry Wall
Gaal Yahas
Damian Conway
Patrick R. Michaud
Damian Conway
Patrick R. Michaud
Larry Wall
Patrick R. Michaud
"TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)"
Larry Wall
|