Re: Ignoring parameters
by Abhijit Mahabal other posts by this author
Jun 17 2005 3:55PM messages near this date
Re: Ignoring parameters
|
Re: Ignoring parameters
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Damian Conway wrote:
> John Siracusa wrote:
>
> > (BTW, I'm not sure where those "./" thingies came from, but it's what
> > GMail
> > showed in your message. I'm assuming it should just be ".")
>
> No. There's now also a unary ./ operator in Perl 6.
>
> Unary . calls a specified method on the current topic.
> Unary ./ calls a specified method on the current invocant.
>
> The point being that methods no longer topicalize their invocant. So you need
> to use ./ instead of . to call methods on an implicit invocant.
Er, is it true that methods don't topicalize the invocant nowadays? I had
thought that they do and one needs the ./ to still talk about the invocant
if some inner loop stole the $_, and until such stealing occurs .foo() and
./foo() are the same...
--abhijit
>
> Damian
>
>
Abhijit Mahabal http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~amahabal/
Thread:
Gaal Yahas
Luke Palmer
John Siracusa
Damian Conway
John Siracusa
David Storrs
Matthew Zimmerman
Juerd
Matthew Zimmerman
Damian Conway
David Storrs
Juerd
Kurt
Jonathan Scott Duff
Juerd
Juerd
Kurt
Juerd
John Siracusa
John Siracusa
Adam Kennedy
Juerd
John Siracusa
Adam Kennedy
John Siracusa
Darren Duncan
John Siracusa
Juerd
Juerd
Darren Duncan
John Siracusa
John Siracusa
John Siracusa
Damian Conway
Abhijit Mahabal
Damian Conway
Patrick R. Michaud
John Siracusa
Larry Wall
Gaal Yahas
Damian Conway
Patrick R. Michaud
Damian Conway
Patrick R. Michaud
Larry Wall
Patrick R. Michaud
"TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)"
Larry Wall
|