On Jun 18, 2005, at 9:24 PM, Damian Conway wrote:

>  chromatic wrote:
> 
> 
> > I find it ugly enough that I plan to name my invocants explicitly.
> >
> 
>  ...which should be construed as a *feature* of the current syntax. ;-)
> 
>  Damian
> 

In that case, why do we have this feature?

Seriously.  Are default invocants really such a good idea?  At least,  
do they need to be there in 6.0.0?  Do they need to be supported in  
the core engine, or could they be pushed out to a module?

I guess that as long as we're arguing the color, we might as well  
argue the location of the bikeshed.

All that said, I still agree with John... './' does not look like  
method call syntax to me.  But, whatever.  I suppose I'll get used to  
this, along with all the other things that have given me the heebie- 
jeebies so far. :/


--Dks