chromatic skribis 2005-06-20 14:56 (-0700):
>  Who says AUTOLOAD will always either call a loaded sub or fail?

I don't recall any clearl spec of Perl 6's AUTOLOAD. If there is
something I missed, say so and please do provide example code. Questions
like the one quoted tend to irritate me.

There is almost always either success or failure. Programming would get
very hard if it weren't as black and white as that, at this level. If
there is anything in between success and failure, indicating success is
probably still the better idea in such cases.

Returning a closure avoids having to lookup the sub again before it is
executed, and it allows for not installing the sub, so that AUTOLOAD is
called again, the next time the same name is used. It also allows doing
nothing: just return sub { }.

I don't think there is anything that this setup cannot do, but I do
think this way is necessary. Because context is dictated by signature,
and signature may not be known for a not-yet loaded sub, AUTOLOAD has to
be called before the arguments are evaluated. Because they're not
evaluated, they cannot be passed, and they cannot be used by AUTOLOAD to
be fed to the (supposedly) newly loaded sub.


Juerd
-- 
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html 
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html