not only that but those people who want this performance boost can use
apc.  i'll give george a patch that solves this if no one else steps
up.

-sterling

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:20:08 -0700, Andi Gutmans <andi@[...].com>  wrote:
>  Nah, I dread the INI word. It makes applications less portable.
>  I prefer rolling back than doing this.
>  
>  Andi
>  
>  
>  
>  At 10:09 AM 7/16/2004 -0700, Sara Golemon wrote:
>  >"Andi Gutmans" <andi@[...].com> wrote in message
>  >news:5.1.0.14.2.20040716081907.027efd68@[...]..
>  > > I don't think it's critical to include this patch, but I do think it'd be
>  >a
>  > > good thing.
>  > > Do you really think it'll break BC for many applications? How many people
>  > > have functions that use null(), false(), true()?
>  > >
>  >I know people hate the dreaded "ini option" word.  But how about one for
>  >this?  That'd let the optimization work for the 99% of scripts that don't
>  >need to implement null(), true(), and false(), and allow those rare few to
>  >simply disable it for BC.
>  >
>  ># Note: I'm no lexx expert, this syntax may not even make sense
>  >
>  ><ST_IN_SCRIPTING>"TRUE" {
>  >   if (CG(fast_constants)) {
>  >     ZVAL_TRUE(zendlval);
>  >     return T_TRUE;
>  >   } else {
>  >     yymore();
>  >   }
>  >  }
>  >
>  >-Sara
>  >
>  >--
>  >PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>  >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>  
>  --
>  PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>  To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>  
> 

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php