ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> php-gtk-general
php-gtk-general
Re: [PHP-GTK] PHP-GTK Standalone Kit
by Simon Wheeler other posts by this author
Aug 8 2007 8:20AM messages near this date
Re: [PHP-GTK] PHP-GTK Standalone Kit | Re: [PHP-GTK] PHP-GTK Standalone Kit
Mr. Dreadsoft wrote:

/some installing systems like NSIS can search for existing php-gtk 
installations. For example, a developer may have a "standard" php-gtk 
installation and another "alpha" installation for testing purposes.

btw, NSIS can use its own download functions (nsisdl.dll functions), so 
wget is not necessary. Anyhow, it would be interesting in a 
cross-platform installer.

/Did not know NSIS could download, even better! /
//
or a standard directory structure, at least for php, extensions, gtk.

/Yes & thats the point of using the registry, as long as the `standard 
current/stable` version path is in the registry then the user can still 
install where they want to, and the extensions etc will be in a 
standardized directory structure format.

All other info could be extracted from the php.ini or from php itself as 
pointed to in the registry.

..............................................................................

Adrian Snyman wrote:

/I have also been in a situation where a program is set up to work in a
SPECIFIC environment. Now I know that we could only certify the
program for a specific release of the underlying software, and the 
client was
forced to ensure their version did comply.
/

/
/

A standalone kit is preferred for many situations and multiple reasons, 
... I have my own for my own usage , however for general php-gtk2 
promotion would it not be nice to have a standardized system so you 
could package up small/whatever app's and know that they are going to 
work for all win32 users without having to package 10MB+ of stuff they 
may or may not already have ?

Also if we have some *published* standards/schema then when we/others do 
make standalone installations we know what to steer clear of to avoid 
messing with the standard installation (like how many apps put the 
php.ini or my.cnf/mysql dll's in %WINDIR% and break other installations) 
, avoiding all of that would give php-gtk2 on win32 some stability.

I just know that when designed by committee we will end up with c:/php5 
and c:/windows php.ini both of which (especially the latter) are bad 
news.. however this issue has popped up enough times already that 
perhaps its time to solve it ?

.................................................................................

I dont think x-platform should come into this particular argument.. 
linux is a whole different kettle of fish with bigger issues of 
dependencies/versions etc.. then again package management is not my thang ;)

Regards,
Simon.
Thread:
Mr. Dreadsoft
Bob Majdak Jr
Steph Fox
Mr. Dreadsoft
Elizabeth Smith
Benjamin Smith
Elizabeth Smith
Adrian Snyman
Simon Wheeler
Mr. Dreadsoft
Simon Wheeler
Elizabeth Smith
Anant Narayanan
Mr. Dreadsoft
Bob Majdak Jr
Marco R
Mr. Dreadsoft

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved