>  > This is very close to the correct solution.  You get the number of
>  > characters in the string with the len() built-in function.  But
>  >
>  >   s = raw_input('Enter a name: ')
>  >   x = 0
>  >   while x <= len(s):
>  >       print s[x]
>  >       x += 1
>  >
>  > will still result in an IndexError (even though it's close to being
>  > correct).  Do you see why?
> 
>  [newbie swing ;-)]
> 
>  I know it works, but would it be bad to do something like
> 
>  s = raw_input('Enter a name: ')
>      for x in range(0, len(s)):
>      print s[x]
> 
>  There's no need to initialize x, or declare our math statement in the
>  code. Thoughts, corrections?


Hi Eric,


Sure, this works great, and you're right: the 'for' loop is the more
appropriate looping construct here, since we're going along the letters of
the name.


We can even do:

###
s = raw_input('Enter a name: ')
for ch in s:
    print ch
###

and skip the manual indicing altogether.  *grin*


Strings are like Lists --- they are both "sequences" --- and the 'for'
loop can deal with them uniformly.  Matt's question asked to do it with
'while', but in real life code, the 'for' loop is usually easier to
construct because it's less open-ended than 'while'.


Good luck!


_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist  -  Tutor@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor