On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Marc Barry wrote:

>  Is it possible to compile Python directly to native machine code? The
>  reason I ask is because I am using Python to do some pretty intensive
>  simulations that take anywhere between 10 minutes and a few hours to
>  run. I assume that if I could compile it directly to machine code that
>  this may speed up my simulation times.

Hi Mark,

At the moment, no.  You may be able to get some substantial performance by
using Psyco, though:

    http://psyco.sourceforge.net/

If your code is particularly algorithmic in nature, Psyco might do wonders
for it.


If you can identify which parts of code are performance hogs, we have a
few options.  For example, it might be possible to recode those
performance-critical pieces in another language --- like C or OCaml ---
and bind those recoded pieces to Python.

If you want to take this route, there's good prior work that's gone into
this.  *grin* People have written several popular tools to help do this
"extending"; you may want to look into Scientific Python's "weave" module:

   http://www.scipy.org/

as well as SWIG:

    http://www.swig.org/



>  Does anyone have any experience with doing this? Would there be any
>  significant gains?

It really depends on the algorithms that you are using.  Do you mind
showing us a sample of the kind of calculations you're doing?  And do you
have a "profile" of your application?  Profiles can help pinpoint busy
areas of the code.  Here's documentation to Python's profiler:

    http://www.python.org/doc/lib/profile.html


Good luck to you!


_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist  -  Tutor@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor