Re: [Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop
by Skip Montanaro other posts by this author
Aug 30 2002 3:41PM messages near this date
Re: [Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop
|
RE: [Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop
> > Opening another hole of a couple machine instructions shouldn't make
> > much difference, although Py_MakePendingCalls should also be changed
> > then to reset ticker to 0 in its "early exit because the coincidences
> > I'm relying on haven't happened yet" cases.
Guido> OK, let's try it then.
You mean I just wasted my time running pystones? ;-)
Just the same, here's the output, after and before. For each setting, I ran
pystones twice manually, then the three reported times:
with patch:
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.52
This machine benchmarks at 6648.94 pystones/second
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.51
This machine benchmarks at 6657.79 pystones/second
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.5
This machine benchmarks at 6666.67 pystones/second
without patch:
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.69
This machine benchmarks at 6501.95 pystones/second
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.68
This machine benchmarks at 6510.42 pystones/second
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.67
This machine benchmarks at 6518.9 pystones/second
I was quite surprised at the difference. Someone definitely should check
this. The patch is at
http://python.org/sf/602191
My guess is that the code is avoiding a lot of pointer dereferences. Oh,
wait a minute. I muffed a bit. I initialized the ticker and checkinterval
variables to 100. Should have been 10.
... a short time passes while Skip thanks God he's not rebuilding VTK ...
With _Py_CheckInterval set to 10 it's still not too shabby:
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.57
This machine benchmarks at 6605.02 pystones/second
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.56
This machine benchmarks at 6613.76 pystones/second
Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 7.55
This machine benchmarks at 6622.52 pystones/second
This is still without Jeremy's suggested change.
apples-and-oranges-ly, y'rs,
Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Thread:
Jeremy Hylton
Guido van Rossum
Greg Ewing
Skip Montanaro
Steve Holden
Steve Holden
Jeremy Hylton
Jack Jansen
Tim Peters
Guido van Rossum
Skip Montanaro
Tim Peters
Jack Jansen
Tim Peters
Jack Jansen
Guido van Rossum
Tim Peters
Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro
Guido van Rossum
Skip Montanaro
Guido van Rossum
Jeremy Hylton
Guido van Rossum
Tim Peters
|