On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:31:46AM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>  Ian Bicking wrote:
>  > I just don't want people to feel discouraged when they try to contribute 
>  > to the Python community and a PEP 13 could help direct people towards 
>  > areas where their contributions are more likely to be useful.  Also I 
>  > think it is unfair to use python-list to clarify things that python-dev 
>  > is not willing to clarify itself.

>  But now: who is going to write it? "Guido should write it" clearly won't
>  work. And no, I'm explicitly not volunteering either.

Well, the PEP will be mostly boilerplate anyway (unless there's a sudden
influx of old ideas) so I'm sure I can whip something up before next
weekend. I'll probably keep the actual list of rejected items to implicit
self (which started the whole discussion), upgrading the Python parser
beyond a simple LL(1), and maybe implicit ()'s for functioncalls, if I feel
inspired. The exact wording, and additional rejects, can be discussed at
length by those interested.

-- 
Thomas Wouters <thomas@[...].net> 

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev-ml%40activestate.c
om