On 1/8/06, Tim Peters <tim.peters@[...].com>  wrote:
>  [Martin]
>  >> But now: who is going to write it? "Guido should write it" clearly won't
>  >> work. And no, I'm explicitly not volunteering either.
> 
>  [Thomas]
>  > Well, the PEP will be mostly boilerplate anyway (unless there's a sudden
>  > influx of old ideas) so I'm sure I can whip something up before next
>  > weekend. I'll probably keep the actual list of rejected items to implicit
>  > self (which started the whole discussion), upgrading the Python parser
>  > beyond a simple LL(1), and maybe implicit ()'s for functioncalls, if I feel
>  > inspired. The exact wording, and additional rejects, can be discussed at
>  > length by those interested.
> 
>  I'll help with this.  That means I want to and intend to, and will
>  discover that I can't actually make any time for it.  With two of us
>  putting it off indefinitely, it should get done in half the time ;-).

Make it a third.  I am willing to help out as needed since I already
keep an eye out for Py3K stuff.  Watching for stuff we don't want to
discuss again is not that much harder.  =)

-Brett
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev-ml%40activestate.c
om