ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> python-list
python-list
Re: Python any good?
by Thanos Vassilakis other posts by this author
Feb 18 2003 2:54AM messages near this date
Re: slow try statements in python? | COM server in python - howto restart server
On the New York Stock Exchange we use three languages in production to
deliver serious trading  services to the Specialists: c, C++, Python.

Perl, tcl/tk, Java are used but for scripting, tools, and minor services
where performance and memory foot print are not an issue. Yes, used
correctly Python meets our performance, security and reliability
requirements.

We have had Java projects and launched Java services, they have all
failed. We have many in the pipeline (thanks Big Blue) but NYSE's only
serious internet based service is written in Python, and was launched in
1998. It is still up in it's sixth version, with no down time!  The fifth
version was rewritten in Java, 6 months overdue, failed, and replaced by
python ( which took two weeks).

Here at SIAC and NYSE Python is recognized by management  to give results
that other languages just can't achieve.

For performance we  have extended Python with our own specialized c
objects, and we have used swig extensively to integrate to our legacy code,
and middleware.

Thanks Python, you let me get home to my kids.


thanos
(currently working on some c legacy code, hence this posting's timestamp!)



                                                                                            
                                   
                    Glen                                                                    
                                   
                    <lpepicel@[...].rr        To:     python-list@[...].org                 
                                  
                    .com>                      cc:                                           
                                   
                    Sent by:                  Subject:     Re: Python any good?             
                                   
                    python-list-admin@                                                      
                                   
                    python.org                                                              
                                   
                                                                                            
                                   
                                                                                            
                                   
                    02/17/2003 08:05                                                        
                                   
                    PM                                                                      
                                   
                                                                                            
                                   
                                                                                            
                                   






Tim Ottinger wrote:


> 
>  I just don't want the world thinking that any program written in python
>  will be too slow for production use. I think that if you look at the
>  applications in the world that use python, you'll be surprized at how
>  amazingly well they perform.
> 
> 
>  Tim
> 

Python is great language.  There is nothing wrong with it IMHO.  As a
bonus it is open source.

Python has many advantages and features: see python.org.

When I say "not fast" I meant no critism.

Maybe I should have said "not for computation intensive problems".  Not
as fast as c or c++.

I didn't mean to say it is slow.  It is great for most business
applications.

I believe it is possible to write parts of a python app in C++ is
needed.  I have never needed to do this.

Also maybe I should have said "less popular than C++" "not as many hits
on monster for python programmers"

Glen.  [python programmer]

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list





-----------------------------------------
This message and its attachments may contain  privileged and confidential information.  If y
ou are not the intended recipient(s), you are prohibited from printing, forwarding, saving o
r copying this email.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify 
the sender and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer.


-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved