Re: python development practices?
by Richard Jones other posts by this author
Oct 31 2001 5:11AM messages near this date
Re: python development practices?
|
Re: python development practices?
On Wednesday 31 October 2001 15:42, pzw1@[...].edu wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Richard Jones wrote:
> > Programmers must be disciplined anyway, again IMO. This idea that
> > programmers can just write whatever they damn well like, with little
> > regard for what other people are diong (an idea propogated mostly by the
> > "write it any damn way you like" ideology of Perl) is extremely
> > detrimental to a working team.
>
> oh, absolutely. disciplined progammers are a must in any circumstance if
> one is to even develop usable code. but no one's perfect, and python is so
> incredibly useful and powerful and elegant in so many cases that it's
> doubly grating on my sensibilities that the language isn't more of an ally
> in catching honest mistakes...
Oh, I just remembered, there are python lint programs. Google search for
"python lint checker" returns:
http://pychecker.sourceforge.net/
http://web.lfw.org/python/
http://www.dotfunk.com/projects/pylint
Haven't used any of them yet - been meaning to have a look for quote a while.
Richard
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thread:
Peter Wang
Peter Hansen
Toby Dickenson
Tim Peters
Steve Holden
Steve Holden
Cliff Wells
Tim Peters
Martijn Faassen
Cliff Wells
Cliff Wells
Martijn Faassen
Martijn Faassen
Paul Rubin
Russell E. Owen
Barry A. Warsaw
Martijn Faassen
Peter Wang
Skip Montanaro
John Roth
David Bolen
Peter Wang
Peter Wang
Skip Montanaro
Chris Tavares
Darren Collins
David Bolen
Paul Rubin
Paul Rubin
Peter Wang
F Basegmez
Richard Jones
Richard Jones
Neal Norwitz
Graham Ashton
Peter Wang
Russell E. Owen
Skip Montanaro
Cliff Wells
Hung Jung Lu
Wade Leftwich
Peter Wang
Peter Wang
Peter Wang
Chris Gonnerman
Paul Rubin
Andrew Dalke
Paul Rubin
Luigi Ballabio
Paul Rubin
Tim Peters
John Roth
Paul Rubin
Richard Jones
|