Re: wxPython vs. tkinter
by other posts by this author
Jun 28 2001 6:27AM messages near this date
RE: [pythoncard] Re: wxPython vs. tkinter
|
Re: [pythoncard] Re: wxPython vs. tkinter
--- In pythoncard@[...]., Roman Suzi <rnd-list@[...]..> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Kevin Altis wrote:
>
> >> From: Skip Montanaro [mailto:skip@[...]..]
> >>
> >> It runs on Windows, not on Mac that I'm aware of. It does
apparently work
> >> on BeOS. I assume the Mac will come along with greater
> >> availability of Mac
> >> OS X. It doesn't look "native" on either Windows or Unix
> >> platforms (is there
> >> a "native" Unix look?)
> >>
> >> As for what it looks like, take a look at the screenshots link on
> >> http://www.gtk.org/. Other related stuff to look at include
Gnome
> >> (http://www.gnome.org/) and the GUI builder Glade
(http://glade.pn.org/ I
> >> think), and specific applications (GIMP, Gnumeric, AbiWord, etc).
> >
> >Well, that makes gtk a non-starter, at least for me.
Native-looking widgets
> >and window types that respond like their native versions is a must.
>
> For me gtk is more native, than Qt or Win ;-)
Historically, of course, the cross-platform GUI argument has been the
same: native widgets (and resulting code complexity and necessity of
multiple code repositories) vs. "new-standard" look and feel (and
resulting loss of platform-specific UI). I have bounced back and
forth
myself.
I am currently of the view that the ubiquity of the Web browser has
all
but eliminated the need for a platform-specific look and feel, and am
supportive of the idea of creating a new UI with the best of the
available UI platforms merged together (or ignored completely) in a
new
user experience.
I've been doing a lot of work in Squeak Smalltalk of late. It has a
set
of built-in classes for building very strongly HyperCard-like things.
The look and feel isn't inherently native but the widget architecture
does nothing to prevent one from implementing such a UI if desired.
In the end, it seems to me that two truths need to be brought to bear
on discussions of this topic:
(1) The desktop UI metaphor has about outlived its usefulness. A
strong
argument can be made for just tossing it in the trash can (which can
be
found right there on the desktop, just like it is in your office! :-)
)
(2) Web-based apps and services have, if not eliminated, at least
rendered less important the platform-specific pieces of user
interface
that most users neither care about nor are aware of. The fact is,
users
are smarter than we think. Faced with a new UI that is similar but
hardly identical to what they are used to seeing, they will adapt if
they are given a good reason to do so.
Thread:
Kevin Altis
Kevin Altis
Skip Montanaro
Kevin Altis
Skip Montanaro
Kevin Altis
Roman Suzi
Roman Suzi
Greg Ewing
Kevin Altis
Roman Suzi
Kevin Altis
Roman Suzi
Andy Todd
Robin Dunn
|