The blog notifies of Ben's comment on
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378809
so has good provenance AFAICS

This get's confusing as ff & xulrunner are not the same. There is no
XULRunner 1.8.1 in
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/nightly/ so i assumed
1.8.0 was the patch fix branch for the XulRunner 1.8 (ff 1.5)
release). But I now see there is a 1.8.1.3 in the /releases.

So if XULRunner 1.8.1 is the patch branch, why is it not in the
nightlies or tinderbox? Unless only trunc is being integration tested.


On 5/10/07, Shane Caraveo <shanec@[...].com>  wrote:
>  fx2 is on the 1.8.1 branch, so no, it is not dead.  while main dev
>  efforts are indeed on trunk, bug fixes will continue to occur on 1.8.1
>  for a good long while *after* fx3 is released.  dont read too much into
>  blogs, especially when the quote people with something like that.
> 
>  Shane
> 
>  Steve Lee wrote:
>  > On 5/9/07, edward baafi <edwardbaafi@[...].com> wrote:
>  >
>  >> Ok.. given the time constraints and the fact that you're aiming for
>  >> embedding and aren't going to use xul widgets, why don't you use one
>  >> of the 1.8 branches and do a pyxpcom build?
>  >
>  > Warning 1.8 builds have just 'died'.
>  > I just caught this on the Mo planet
>  >
>  > http://coop.deadsquid.com/?p=1039
>  >
> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  pyxpcom mailing list
>  pyxpcom@[...].com
>  To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
> 


-- 
Steve Lee
--
Open Source Assistive Technology Software
PowerTalk - your presentations can speak for themselves
www.fullmeasure.co.uk
_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs