So we loose confidence that there is no checkin breaking 1.8.0.
I got into the habit of checking tinderbox (trunk) before getting and building.

On 5/10/07, edward baafi <edwardbaafi@[...].com>  wrote:
>  The blog referring to the death of the 1.8 branch is only stating that
>  1.8.0 will no longer be built on tinderbox..
> 
>  On 5/10/07, Mark Hammond <mhammond@[...].au> wrote:
>  > Steve writes:
>  > > On 5/9/07, edward baafi <edwardbaafi@[...].com> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > > Ok.. given the time constraints and the fact that you're aiming for
>  > > > embedding and aren't going to use xul widgets, why don't you use one
>  > > > of the 1.8 branches and do a pyxpcom build?
>  > >
>  > > Warning 1.8 builds have just 'died'.
>  > > I just caught this on the Mo planet
>  > >
>  > > http://coop.deadsquid.com/?p=1039
>  >
>  > Ahh - but isn't this a perfect example of the technical issues we do face
>  > (in contrast to those I just said we didn't :)
>  >
>  > My checkout of the 1.8 branch builds with pyxpcom enabled for me.  It does
>  > fail to pass the tests with errors I expect to be shallow, but that sounds
>  > like a different problem than you are seeing (you said 'builds' have died)?
>  >
>  > Mark.
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > pyxpcom mailing list
>  > pyxpcom@[...].com
>  > To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
>  >
> 


-- 
Steve Lee
--
Open Source Assistive Technology Software
PowerTalk - your presentations can speak for themselves
www.fullmeasure.co.uk
_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs