ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> pyxpcom
pyxpcom
Re: [pyxpcom] XULRunner + PyXPCOM
by Mark Hammond other posts by this author
Jan 22 2008 1:34PM messages near this date
view in the new Beta List Site
Re: [pyxpcom] XULRunner + PyXPCOM | Re: [pyxpcom] XULRunner + PyXPCOM
>  edward baafi wrote:
>  > Hi Todd,
>  >
>  > I checked out the extension site you referenced..  I was wondering
>  about
>  > the "huge" 12mb download..  I've hacked Mark Hammond's XPI generation
>  > script for gecko 1.8 (FF1.5-2) with a resulting XPI around 2mb
>  including
>  > the python .dll or .so..  I also got it to build standalone (separate
>  > from the rest of the beast) so build time was quite quick..
>  >
>  > Have you looked at Mark's approach?  Overall I agree that a
>  Xulrunner/FF
>  > extension is the way to move this stuff forward..
>  >
>  
>  Hi Edward,
>  
>  Yes, I have taken a good look at Mark's work and notes.
>  
>  The size likely can be trimmed down a lot, I have not been overly
>  concerned with the size for the moment.
>  
>  I've left it pretty fat in my builds so far, using ".pyc" files instead
>  of ".pyo", including additional libraries such as the pywin32
>  components, socket, ssl, bz2 etc... not compressing the Python standard
>  library "Python25.zip" (currently 8 MB on Windows) so startup time is
>  faster (I'm not sure if this is that applicable, I have not tested the
>  difference with a compressed version), but was going by MarkH's notes.
>  
>  I was also thinking of fixing up the build parts not to have to go
>  through the full build process, so if you have workings on this already
>  and want to help out I'd appreciate the help.

I don't quite understand *why* you created your own.  This community would
be best served by people rallying behind a "single way to do it", rather
than fragmenting into every man-and-his-dog having their own unsupported way
of doing things?  I've no objection to your scheme become that one way, but
I've never heard what you are trying to solve that mine doesn't - in fact,
I've never heard anything about it at all.

Mark

_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
Thread:
Shane Caraveo
Paul Everitt
Jesus Cea
Shane Caraveo
Paul Everitt
Edward Baafi
Shane Caraveo
Paul Everitt
Paul Everitt
Mark Hammond
Todd Whiteman
Paul Everitt
Edward Baafi
Mark Hammond
Paul Everitt
Todd Whiteman
Mark Hammond
Shane Caraveo
Todd Whiteman
Edward Baafi
Todd Whiteman
Mark Hammond
Todd Whiteman
Edward Baafi
Todd Whiteman
Shane Caraveo

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© 2004 ActiveState, a division of Sophos All rights reserved