Re: [pyxpcom] XULRunner + PyXPCOM
by Paul Everitt other posts by this author
Jan 23 2008 12:04PM messages near this date
view in the new Beta List Site
Re: [pyxpcom] XULRunner + PyXPCOM
|
Re: [pyxpcom] XULRunner + PyXPCOM
Three quick updates:
1) After quite a bit of pain, I found out that my troubles since
Friday were due to the trunk not working. I found a tag for 1.9b2,
grabbed that, and was able to build xulrunner on OS X again.
2) Unfortunately, pyxpcom generates new and interesting errors from
that branch.
3) Most important to the discussion now, I found another company
willing to match my bounty for a follow-on bounty. That is, if the
first step produces some basic, reliable builds, they would put up a
second bounty for a next step.
Regarding the comments about which build system, I agree with Mark
that we need to converge on one. I won't prejudice the choice. Mark
obviously has 99% of the history on this, but Todd mentions some gaps
that he is interested in.
Let me know if there is interest in a bounty and I'll pursue it.
--Paul
On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 11:15 AM, edward baafi wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Would a bounty help? Meaning, I'd put up some money to get the
> > xulrunner+pyxpcom build system up-to-snuff on the trunk and on
> > autopilot?
> >
> > Sure, why not?
> >
> > If so, is there a reasonable population of people that might be
> > willing to do it for an amount that isn't in 4 digits? :^) Or, is it
> > a very small group that has a high commercial rate for which they're
> > fully booked?
> >
> >
> > I'm pretty busy and don't usually take on projects for less than 4
> > digits :) but this could really help the community so I guess I'd
> > consider it..
> >
> > I don't know what the state of the pyxpcom community is, but why
> > don't you put together a spec and a price and post it and see (to
> > this list as well as some of the bounty sites).. I guess I'm
> > wondering what would help you and most people get started
> > quickly.. Would it be a build system that works reliably but still
> > takes a few hours on a modern machine, or pre-built executables
> > targeted for Windows/Linux/MacOSX?
>
> I like the nightly trunk builds:
>
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/nightly/latest-trunk/
>
> If I could get that, just for trunk, but with:
>
> - A few patches applied
>
> - PyXPCOM and a bundled Python
>
> ....then I'd be happy. Regarding whether the bounty is "a script
> that when run on my computer, produces a DMG" or "a site that
> automatically builds for all targets and uploads", I'd say the
> latter is way, way too big for discussion. :^)
>
> I'd pay $600 to get a really-working version of that. However, I'm
> a bit worried that xulrunner+python isn't a proposition that, once
> working now, would stay working later. I don't get the sense that
> someone feels long-term ownership towards it. There are many who
> have contributed incredible work on incredibly hard stuff, but
> keeping the bits working isn't a primary activity for them.
>
> --Paul
Thread:
Shane Caraveo
Paul Everitt
Jesus Cea
Shane Caraveo
Paul Everitt
Edward Baafi
Shane Caraveo
Paul Everitt
Paul Everitt
Mark Hammond
Todd Whiteman
Paul Everitt
Edward Baafi
Mark Hammond
Paul Everitt
Todd Whiteman
Mark Hammond
Shane Caraveo
Todd Whiteman
Edward Baafi
Todd Whiteman
Mark Hammond
Todd Whiteman
Edward Baafi
Todd Whiteman
Shane Caraveo
|