>  I think that's the rub.  For pyxpcom to have a future for people like
>  me, it needs to be easily built, and stay easily built.  I'm not sure
>  anybody is committed to the latter.  Perhaps I'm seeing things the
>  wrong way?

That is correct - certainly in respect to making binaries for any platform.
I explicitly declined to take on that responsibility when I sent the
packager script to the list - I expressed a hope someone would run with it
as I don't have the bandwidth myself.

I'm committed to keeping the trunk building on my primary dev platform
(currently Windows), but not committed to checking that it still builds on a
regular basis :)  It has even happened in the past that people I've never
heard of open bugzilla bugs with a pyxpcom build issue, and I tend to jump
on any problem reports I get fairly quickly.

Cheers,

Mark

_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs