Stefano J Attardi wrote:
>  Hi Todd,
> 
>  thanks for the great work in packaging PyXPCOM in easy to use builds.
> 
>  I was wondering why you chose to compile Python with UCS4? That
>  basically means that Pyxpcomext is incompatible with all the binary
>  Python modules we are using.
> 
>  I am trying to switch our project over from custom builds of Xulrunner
>  to the official builds plus Pyxpcomext.
> 
>  Would you suggest we recompile the other modules using UCS4, or
>  recompile Pyxpcomext with Python UCS2?
> 
>  I have tried both, but failed (I'm using a PPC Mac, and my experience
>  with compiling on Unix is quite limited).
> 
>  If it makes sense, would it possible for you to provide a UCS2 build as well?
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Stefano J. Attardi
>    

Hi Stefano,

I think you may be right in that UCS2 for pyxpcomext could have been a 
better default choice, as that would be more compatible with the stock 
Python builds. I'll look into this some more and make sure it's all 
going to work, then hopefully I can provide the UCS2 builds as well.

Cheers,
Todd

_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs