Re: Cloning into an object
by David A. Black other posts by this author
Apr 30 2005 8:29PM messages near this date
Re: Cloning into an object
|
Re: Installing all gems
Hi --
On Sun, 1 May 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:
> I read a little more about become. It looks like it might be
> made standard in ruby at some point. Will it have the above
> functionality. Or will it do something like what I think the
> smalltalk "become" does - change all references to the
> destination object to point to the source object. I really
> don't want the reference changes because a) it seems very
> expensive (search the object space), and b) this would cause
> the object id to change.
I thought that was the whole point of "become". Certainly it doesn't
make sense for references to object x to persist in being reference to
object x if object x has "become" object y. (The idea of having this
in Ruby doesn't appeal to me, but that's my understanding of its
premise, anyway.)
David
--
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net
Thread:
Eric Mahurin
Nobu Nokada
David A. Black
|