ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> ruby-talk
ruby-talk
Re: Ruby is exploding onto the scene as Java did at the end of 1990s
by Chad Perrin other posts by this author
Aug 17 2006 2:52PM messages near this date
Re: Ruby is exploding onto the scene as Java did at the end of 1990s | Re: Ruby is exploding onto the scene as Java did at the end of 1990s
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:43:49AM +0900, Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
>  On 8/17/06, Charles O Nutter <headius@[...].com> wrote:
>  > I think there's a short answer that would please almost everyone: Ruby 
>  makes
>  >development cheaper, more fun, and more compelling than it has been since
>  >the late 90s.
>  
>  As interesting as your whole argument sounds, it's light on specific
>  business drivers. Enterprise IT is in the middle of a secular
>  transformation that will fundamentally change the playing field for
>  traditional vendors. You've correctly perceived that an explosion in
>  development productivity is under way. At the moment it's being spent
>  in an orgy of wheel-reinventing that Java (through the miracle of
>  well-focused corporate sponsorship) managed to largely avoid. But
>  along with the miracle of corporate sponsorship came the horror of...
>  Java itself, and there is an argument to be made that it couldn't have
>  turned out any other way.

I'm inclined to agree, re: Java.


>  
>  The right model for Ruby advocacy may not be Java but rather Python
>  (or Linux). If so, then success will come from organic growth and
>  slow, steady success, largely in projects far from the enterprise
>  mainstream (which these days is all bogged down thinking about
>  governance models for SOA- talk about expending cycles that don't
>  deliver business value!)

I'm inclined to agree here, as well -- most thoroughly.  I'd rather see
that sort of organic growth, in part because it would likely ensure that
the potential for disillusionment when the realities of the language are
separated from the marketing is minimized.  I think that Perl could be
added to the list of examples of the "right" model (it has had strong
successes, after all, and is still used widely and more so every year),
and that Logo should likely be listed amongst the examples of "wrong"
ways to do it (it's a victim of its own success as an "educational"
language: everyone thinks of it as a toy for children, while at least
one implementation of it is an easier-to-learn, truly powerful Lisp
dialect, and hype is what killed it).

-- 
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
This sig for rent:  a Signify v1.14 production from http://www.debian.org/
Thread:
Zoat
Matthew Moss
Francis Cianfrocca
Charles O Nutter
Francis Cianfrocca
John Lam
Francis Cianfrocca
M. Edward Borasky
Daniel Berger
Huw Collingbourne
M. Edward Borasky
Francis Cianfrocca
Charles O Nutter
Francis Cianfrocca
Charles O Nutter
Francis Cianfrocca
Elliot Temple
Pixelnate
Charles O Nutter
Chad Perrin
Francis Cianfrocca
Chad Perrin
Patrick Hurley
Leslie Viljoen
Chad Perrin
Robert Dober
Robert Dober
N Okia
Chad Perrin
Krf
Daniel Berger
Robert Dober

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved