Reid Thompson <Reid.Thompson@[...].com>  writes:

>  On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:05 +0900, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
> > Why not Ruby and Java and C++? 
> > The realy unanswered question is when is one better than the other. I
> > even have seen someone using C for "scripting" ;-)
> > 
>  :)
>  http://www.softintegration.com/
Yeah I know that but I was talking of compiled C. So a bit different
;-). IIRC that was for parsing some XML.... 
> 
>  Ch is an embeddable C/C++ interpreter for cross-platform scripting,
>  shell programming, 2D/3D plotting, numerical computing, and embedded
>  scripting. Ch is the solution for:
It's very C-ish but the libraries make the difference. However others
have written C-Interpreters also:
Eic (now abondoned)
Cint http://root.cern.ch/root/Cint.html
and another one which name I forgot...

And I remember that in anotherthread someone suggested to use the Ruby
Interpreter as a somewhat bigger library ;-)

Regards
Friedrich

-- 
Please remove just-for-news- to reply via e-mail.