ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> ruby-talk
ruby-talk
Re: FYI - Ruby related article/blog on Reddit front page
by Ara T Howard other posts by this author
Dec 14 2006 10:54AM messages near this date
Re: FYI - Ruby related article/blog on Reddit front page | Ruby on rails error
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Jason Roelofs wrote:

>  I guess I should have expounded on my use of the word "professional".
>  Everything you say, Dave, is right, but we are forgetting the even larger
>  community that decrys Ruby as too slow and a "hobbyist language," that is
>  "not fit for enterprise (*shudder*) use". I myself have use Ruby in a
>  professional project, so I am not saying anything against that, but more of
>  those people that I run into and deal with that just don't understand Ruby
>  because it's too young and slow, usually comparing it to Perl.

which is a major apples to oranges comparisson.  if you write packages in perl
- the object hack they did - then perl is more often slower than ruby for
modular oo code.  also, to be frank, this is like saying turtles are faster
that slugs: they are both slow.  so is java.  so is c++.  if you want fast
write c, ocaml (or maybe fortran) period.

>  Also, the issue that it's something else that needs to be installed has been
>  a hindrance to the adoption of the language in larger companies, while Perl
>  and Java are automatically installed on any server. This is why JRuby is
>  such a great project (as most people have realized and hell is the basis of
>  the project IIRC) and it will help put Ruby in a more "professional" light
>  to the rest of IT.

true.  still, all the decent operating systems ship with it now.

>  I wasn't trying to say that Ruby is not to be used professionally yet; the
>  language has definitely proved itself many times in such environments.
>  However, to get more people (especially the Perl guys) to even try the
>  language, these improvements need to be made. Then there will only be the "I
>  like Perl better" argument, for which we can reply "Your loss."

i'm not sure that's true.  i've converted many perl coders here at noaa - perl
programmers are often quite pragmatic and, in my experience, most will prefer
either ruby or python (religious issue) if someone shows them even a little
code.

-a
-- 
if you find yourself slandering anybody, first imagine that your mouth is
filled with excrement.  it will break you of the habit quickly enough. - the
dalai lama
Thread:
Drew Olson
Jason Roelofs
dblack
Jason Roelofs
Ara T Howard

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved