Luis Parravicini wrote:
>  On 10/29/07, mortee <mortee.lists@[...].hu> wrote:
> > Sorry but I guess the gem's name is somewhat inadequate. This is not a
> > binary search library, but a text indexing and searching library which
> > happens to employ a binary search algorithm. So you essentially reserve
> > this gem name from some possible real binsearch library...
>  
>  You're right. I never stop for a second thought about the gem's name.
>  Maybe I choose some cryptic name where there is no chance of
>  collision.

I haven't intended to suggest a cryptic name - just something more
specific to what your gem actually does.

mortee