ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> ruby-talk
ruby-talk
Re: LISP macros vs Ruby procs ?
by Lith other posts by this author
Nov 6 2009 12:05PM messages near this date
Re: LISP macros vs Ruby procs ? | Re: LISP macros vs Ruby procs ?
>  LISP's ` (the backtick) is roughly equivalent to Ruby's eval with a
>  string, right?

That like saying a string is equivalent to an array/list. In lisp, a
macro can take the arguments transform it using the usual set of list-
related functions and generate the code for the macro. In scheme, you
can use some sort of structured pattern matching to generate the code.

>  If there are any seasoned LISPers here, can you think of a sample LISP
>  macro that can't be written in Ruby, to help me understand better?

I haven't written a single line in lisp for years but: Try to
implement lisp's loop form[1] or scheme's hygienic macros[2] in ruby
-- you're allowed to use only ruby 1.9 standard library.

[1] http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_loop.htm
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hygienic_macro IIRC slib[3] contains
an implementation for older scheme interpreters.
[3] http://people.csail.mit.edu/jaffer/slib_toc.html
Thread:
Aldric Giacomoni
David Masover
Ryan Davis
Lith
Rick DeNatale
Lith
Aldric Giacomoni
Marnen Laibow-Koser

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved