Jonathan Guyer wrote:
>  I've finally done some benchmarking of scipy.sparse and PySparse and 
>  posted my results and comments on plone[*]:
>  
>       <http://www.scipy.org/wikis/featurerequests/SparseSolvers>
>  
>  Bottom line is that, with a couple of exceptions, PySparse is both 
>  faster and less memory intensive than SciPy. I don't know whether 
>  anything can be lifted from PySparse to improve SciPy's implementation.

Thanks for your 'great sparse shoot-out'! Just a little note: the link 
in the section discussing update_add_at() does not work for me (PAGE NOT 
FOUND).

r.

_______________________________________________
Scipy-dev mailing list
Scipy-dev@[...].net
http://www.scipy.net/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev