SERVICES 
>   Also, is [xml:id] on the WS-I radar
>  for addressing XML Signature interop?

I don't think it's a WS-I issue (Im' on the security group), but rather
more of a WS-Security and SAML issue.  There has been lots of heated
discussion in those two groups about ID (type, not name:) attributes,
embedding documents in other docs, etc.  xml:id is not quite a panacea,
although some think it comes *real* close.  Unfortunately, I forget the
details.  Ron Monzillo at Sun is very involved in this; let me know if you
want his email; I don't want to post it to the public list.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->  
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/W6uqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->  

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This group is a forum for builders of SOAP implementations to discuss implementation and int
eroperability issues.  Please stay on-topic. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*>  To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soapbuilders/

<*>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    soapbuilders-unsubscribe@[...].com

<*>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/