Dave wrote:
> >>(the BDG spec could of course spell it out: "if an implementation
> receives something that is valid SOAP, but outside this subset, it
> should detect this problem and report it back using the SOAP fault
> mechanisms.")
> Yes! That's exactly what I was trying to get Jake to tell me.
> Jake, take note.
> Dave

If this includes faulting when a mustUnderstand header is
sent then this is good (and alleviates my previous concern).
So I think Simon's (was it Simon?) fault tests need to be
mandatory.
-Dug