Dave Winer wrote:
> 
>  BTW, to Sam, a minor correction, I would not say that there *will* be
>  follow-on documents, I would be happy to say that there *may* be such
>  documents. I can't commit to writing them, as I could not, at the outset
of
>  this mini-process, have committed to writing the BDG.

Fair enough.  We await your "suitably upbeat" rendition of this sentiment.
;-)

IMHO if that if the BDG is successful (likelihood: very high), and we can
agree on priorities for the next batch (likelihood: high), then I do see it
as quite likely   that there will be a follow on document.  You may not be
the author/editor of it, but somehow I suspect that you will be.

- Sam Ruby