Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:

>  And, by the way, it seems to work!
>  
>  Actually, the only limit I see is the own-made FuzzyOcr.words 
>  (and, maybe, the fact that script text may probably get 
>  undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected 
>  text back to SA? There should be enough variants of spam 
>  worlds to let SA fuzzily catch the ones from images.
>  
>  Am I wrong?

I think so.  Some of the words would be perfectly legitimate in the text
of emails but rarely found in attached legitimate images.

Quite apart from the fact that Spamassassin isn't designed for
"reinjection".

Cheers,

Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK